Friday, December 23, 2005

Genocide—Dutch Court Labels Iraq Massacre “Genocide”

A Dutch court today convicted exporter Frans van Anraat to 15 years in jail for war crimes for selling chemical to Saddam Hussein’s regime.[1] The court found that the chemicals were used to manufacture the poison gas used in deadly attacks against Kurdish villages in the 1980s. This is the first case to be decided concerning the use of chemical warfare—and on the allegation that a genocide occurred in Iraq.[2]

In a previous post, we discussed the implications of a finding of genocide in this state court case with regard to the case against Saddam Hussein in the Iraq Special Tribunal (IST). The IST will reconvene on January 24, 2006.[3]

Now that van Anraat has been convicted on criminal charges, the surviving victims may bring a civil suit against him personally to claim damages. They may also draw in the chemical supplies manufacturers who participated in the business chain with him.



[1] 15 Years for Chemicals-to-Iraq Man: Dutchman Who Aided Hussein Regime Convicted of War Crimes, CNN World, Dec. 23, 2005, available here.
[2] Id.
[3] As Trial Stops for the Holidays, Saddam Appears in Control, International Herald Tribune, Dec. 23, 2005, available here.

Genocide—ICTR Cooperator/Accused Found Dead

A former Rwandan Commerce Minister, Juvenal Uwilingiyimana, was confirmed dead this week in Belgium, where he had lived under refugee status since 1998.[1] His family reported him missing on November 22, 2005, just days after his last interview with authorities at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR); his body was discovered in a Brussels canal on December 17.[2]

The former Commerce Minister was indicted in June 2005 for genocide and crimes against humanity for his role in the massacres that took place in Rwanda in 1994.[3] The execution of his August 2005 arrest warrant was held in abeyance in exchange for his cooperation with the ICTR. Although interviews throughout the last year and a half have been voluntary, the Tribunal reported that the Minister expressed concerns for himself and his family from “powerful persons in the Rwandan exile community” as recently as a November 2 interview.[4] Ultimately, the Prosecutor would probably have required Mr. Uwilingiyimana to testify at the trials of other ICTR indictees in exchange for consideration regarding his own indictment.

Upon hearing the news, the Tribunal's Prosecutor, Hassan Jallow, conveyed sincere condolences to the family. In a published statement, the ICTR acknowledged that by cooperating with the Prosecutor some individuals “mark themselves forever as traitors in some parts of their community and run the risk that vengeance will be taken against them or against their families.”[5] In this case the Office of the Prosecutor undertook extraordinary measures and admitted that they would consider those protective measures inadequate if the Minister’s death is found to be a homicide. The ICTR called on Belgian police to “arrest and try those responsible for a crime that obstructs justice for the victims of the Rwanda genocide.”[6]



[1] Rwanda: Body Found in Brussels Canal Confirmed That of Ex-Minister's, IRIN News, Dec. 23, 2005, available here.
[2] ICTR Indictee Juvenal Uwilingiyimana Confirmed Dead, ICTR Press Release, Dec. 23, 2005, available here.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.

Thursday, December 22, 2005

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb will be a guest on Fort Collins, Colorado’s tomorrow morning. He is scheduled to be on the air with Gail Fallen and Keith Weinman at 8:05 AM Mountain Time (10:05 AM Eastern), and he will be discussing recent developments in the extradition of Raul Gomez-Garcia. You can listen to the interview on the internet .

War Crimes—Serbia Accelerates Cooperation with ICTY

Serbia was listening when International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) Chief Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte urged national and international cooperation in bringing remaining ICTY fugitives to justice last week in her address to the UN Security Counsel. In a clear sign of the intensified effort to comply with the demand, Serbian War Crimes Prosecutor Vladimir Vukcevic announced today that local authorities have identified people who are in communication with indicted war crimes fugitives Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic. Vukcevic stated, ''I am warning all those who in any way ... communicate with the Hague fugitives that they will be prosecuted.”[1]

Serbian government and defense officials are also meeting today to discuss further cooperation efforts. Minister of Human and Minority Rights Rasim Ljajic stated that the Serbian National Council on Cooperation with The Hague and other political authorities are expected to grant ICTY investigators access to confidential archives within the next few days.[2]

The meeting follows Serbian Deputy Prime Minister Miroljub Labus’ public acknowledgment yesterday that the nation’s failure to locate and extradite international fugitives threatens to destroy Serbia’s hopes of joining the European Union (EU).[3] After spending the day in talks with EU officials he warned, “I think we should not underestimate or overestimate what Carla Del Ponte has said…The reputation of our country is at stake.”[4]

The ICTY completion strategy requires that all trials be concluded by 2008 and all appeals by 2010—unless top fugitives are extradited to the Tribunal quickly. In a recent post, we noted that ICTY officials have already projected that trials will continue through 2009. Karadzic and Mladic were indicted in 1995 for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity stemming from their involvement in the 1991-1995 Balkans conflicts.



[1] Serbian Tracking Supporters of Top War Crimes, Independent Online, Dec. 22, 2005, available here.
[2] Labus: Serbia’s Reputation at Stake, B92 News, Dec. 22, 2005, available here.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Crimes Against Humanity—Iraqi Court Resumes with Saddam, Without Clark

Today, the trial of Saddam Hussein resumed at the Iraqi Special Tribunal in Baghdad with the defendant in attendance.[1] Before the Tribunal recessed for two weeks during the national parliamentary elections, Hussein declared a boycott of the trial, making a flamboyant exit by telling the court to “go to hell.” Today, he appeared to be more subdued. When the court refused Hussein’s request for a recess to perform mid-day prayers, he reacted mildly and appeared to conduct prayer quietly from his seat.[2]

Since this morning, however, there have been reports of additional outbursts by Hussein in reaction to some of the witness testimony.[3] CNN is reporting that Hussein has disrupted the proceedings by shouting out allegations that he and his co-defendants have been beaten and tortured by their American‑led multinational guards.

"I was beaten on every part of my body and marks are still on top of my body and that was done by Americans," Hussein said. "Yes, [we] were beaten by the Americans and we were tortured, every one of us."[4] Chief Prosecutor Jaafar al‑Mousawi protested the outburst, proclaiming that he had visited the defendants in their cells and saw no signs of torture.[5] Spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Christopher Reid, officially stated that none of the defendants have been tortured or beaten.[6]

Previously, the former Iraqi dictator’s chief complaints concerned the poor detention conditions underlying his dissatisfaction with the proceedings, specifically the “terroristic” lack of adequate opportunities to shower, change clothes, smoke, and exercise.

Critics of the Iraqi Court have taken issue with the apparent tolerance of the bench with regard to repeated and disruptive outbursts by this defendant, citing such latitude as evidence of inappropriate judicial deference to the former dictator and to other formerly high-ranking military and government officials on trial. Under the Iraqi Special Tribunal Rules of Procedure and Evidence, judges have the discretion to remove an accused from the courtroom and continue the trial in his absence “if he persists in disruptive conduct.”[7] So far, the majority of Hussein’s absences have been self-motivated.

Hussein and his 7 co-defendants were charged with crimes against humanity in the torture and killing of more than 140 Shi'ite Muslims 23 years ago in the village of Dujail.[8] All face the possibility of death by hanging if found guilty. There are 11 other investigations into Saddam Hussein’s involvement in events at other times and in other regions. In case of a favorable verdict or sentence in this first trial, Hussein could face additional judicial proceedings in any or all of these other matters.

Notably not present in the courtroom today—defense attorney Ramsey Clark. The former U.S. Attorney General Clark has not yet returned to Baghdad because of security concerns.[9] His co-counsel Curtis Doebbler was also reported to have been absent from the courtroom at the beginning of today’s proceedings.[10] The trial is continuing with more witness testimony about the alleged atrocities in Dujail. Today’s witnesses, like 8 of 10 previous witnesses, are speaking under protective conditions.[11]

After today’s testimony, the Tribunal is expected to adjourn proceedings tomorrow until mid‑January to allow for the announcement of Iraq's election results, for the holidays, and for the Hajj, the annual Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca.[12]



[1] Saddam Hussein Trial Resumes in Baghdad, VOA News [hereinafter VOA], Dec. 21, 2005, available here.
[2] Id.
[3] Hussein Says He Was Beaten in Custody, CNN [hereinafter CNN], Dec. 21, 2005, available here.
[4] CNN, supra note 3.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] IST R. Proc. and Evid. 72(2), available here. Compare to Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(c) in which continually disruptive behavior can amount to waiver of the right to present for trial. Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(a) implements the 6th Amendment guarantee of a criminal defendant’s right to be present at every phase of a trial.
[8] IST Elements of Crimes Art. 12 (Crimes Against Humanity), Art. 12(a)(1) (Murder) and Art. 12(a)(6) (Torture), available here.
[9] Saddam Trial Witness Tells of 'Indescribable Torture', Agence France-Presse [hereinafter AFP], Dec. 21, 2005, available here.
[10] Id.
[11] VOA supra note 1.
[12] Hussein Case Judge Stops Outbursts as Trial Continues, Bloomberg News, Dec. 21, 2005, available here.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb has been quoted extensively in an article about former Qwest CEO Joseph Nacchio’s federal indictment.
Douglas McNabb, principal of McNabb Associates, a law firm specializing in the defense of individuals charged with white-collar crimes, said that each count carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in Federal prison.

McNabb noted that several other former Qwest executives had been indicted and agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors.

"They've reached a plea agreement with the government that says they'll plead guilty to certain offenses and assist the government with regard to the prosecution of others. They may be called to testify at trial against this gentleman," he said.



According to McNabb, the overall conviction rate in cases brought by the DoJ is about 91 percent, and the government wins roughly 86 percent of its cases on appeal.

He said the trial could take six to eight weeks; if Nacchio loses, he can appeal to the 10th Circuit Court, also located in Denver. After a loss there, Nacchio could petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal, but the Supremes can decline to do so.

"When you've been indicted by the U.S. government," McNabb said, "that hill you have to [climb] over gets even taller."[1]


[1] Susan Kuchinskas, , InternetNews.com, Dec. 20, 2005.

War Crimes—Serbian and Bosnian Courts Begin Srebrenica Trials

This week, a videotape previously entered into evidence in the international criminal trial of Slobodan Milosevic is at the heart of the war crimes trial in Serbian court.[1] Last week, Trial Chamber at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in the Milosevic case denied the prosecution's motion concerning testimonial evidence of the same allegedly execution-style killing of six Bosnian Muslim civilians by Serb militiamen near the eastern Bosnian enclave of Srebrenica.[2]

Five former members of the “Scorpions” unit who were allegedly involved in the killings have been charged in Serbian national courts with committing war crimes. If found guilty, they could receive up to 40 years imprisonment.[3] The videotaped evidence has been portrayed as the “strongest” evidence of Milosevic’s involvement with the events at Srebrenica in 1995.[4]

Although the amateur footage was shown last June in the genocide trial of Milosevic, the Trial Chamber last week denied a motion by the Prosecution to reopen its case in order to hear testimony from the Scorpion members seen in the tape.[5] However, it is likely that the Tribunal will hear their testimony about Milosevic’s role in the events during the Prosecution’s rebuttal at the close of the defense case.[6]

A conviction in the state case may add a strategic advantage to the Prosecution’s presentation, but should not change the legal value of the actual testimony. However, there could be a more powerful effect on public opinion toward the war crimes trials generally in the Balkans, particularly given the graphic nature of the images of Serbian soldiers on the videotape.

In Sarajevo, a Bosnian State Court upheld the indictment of 11 people accused of genocide for taking part in the 1995 massacre of the Muslims of Srebrenica in the nearby village of Kravica.[7] Bosnia's State Court was established in 2002 and ultimately will handle war crimes trials with regard to the 1990s Balkan conflicts, as such matters are tranferred from the U.N. Tribunal at The Hague to local jurisdictions.

In Belgrade, Bruno Vekaric, spokesman for Serbian war crimes prosecutors stated, ''This is a trial of great importance for our judiciary because we want to prove that we can handle the most serious cases stemming from the (Balkan) wars.''[8]



[1] Serbs on Trial Over Video Killings, Associated Press [hereinafter AP], Dec. 20, 2005, available here.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] ICTY Press Release, Dec. 14, 2005, available here. Spokesman for the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) Nikiforov confirmed that, unless the Chamber’s decision is overturned first, the evidence may be introduced by rebuttal witnesses.
[7] AKI News Agency, Bosnia: Eleven Serbs Indicted for 1995 Genocide, Dec. 20, 2005, available here.
[8] AP, supra note 1.

ICC Prosecutor to Investigate Hariri

International Criminal Court (ICC) Deputy Prosecutor and head of the investigation branch of the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) Serge Brammertz is expected to take over as head of the United Nations investigation of the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Al Hariri.[1] An official announcement from the U.N. is expected later this week.

After an unproductive initial investigation, the 15-member U.N. Security Council decided last week to extend the mandate of the inquiry for another six months.[2] In the face of charges that Syria stymied the efforts of the previous investigation, Syrian authorities have vowed to be more cooperative during the follow-up phase. [3]



[1] Reuters News Agency, Syria 'Will Cooperate' With New Probe, Dec. 20, 2005, here.
[2] Id.
[3] Bahrain News Agency, A Belgian Prosecutor to Replace Mehlin, Dec. 20, 2005, here.

Monday, December 19, 2005

International Criminal Courts Recess

The majority of the world’s international criminal tribunals have suspended trial activities for the annual winter recess. Schedules and items of interest are noted below.

International Criminal Court (ICC)
The ICC will be in recess until January 9, 2006.

Last week, Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo reported to the UN Security Council on the investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur.[1]

The ICC ended this year by issuing its first-ever arrest warrants and by formally moving from an organizational phase to a phase of active investigations into referred cases. The first trials are expected to commence in 2006.[2]

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
The ICTY will be in recess until January 9, 2006

The Trial Chamber in the Milosevic case ordered an additional three weeks of recess for the purpose of allowing the defendant additional time to rest and attend to medical problems. The Milosevic trial will resume on January 23 with continuation of the defense case.[3]

Last Thursday, in her winter address to the UN Security Council, Chief Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte called for increased pressure on the Bosnian and Serb governments to deliver the remaining indictees still at large to The Hague for trial.[4] Of the six remaining fugitives, attention is focused primarily on Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic. Both men have been indicted on charges of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
The ICTR will be in recess until January 9, 2006

ICTR President Judge Erik Møse addressed the UN Security Council last week and presented an general update on cases currently before the Tribunal, in addition to those recently concluded.[5] Judge Møse stated that the ICTR is on track to complete all trials by 2008 and all appeals by 2010, as specified in the UN completion strategy.

Special Court of Sierra Leone (SCSL)
The SCSL will be in recess until January 9, 2006.

On its current schedule, the Court will continue to try cases until mid-2007 concerning alleged international crimes committed in the territory of Sierra Leone after November 30, 1996.

Iraqi Special Tribunal
The Iraqi Tribunal went into recess during the recent Parliamentary elections and is scheduled to reconvene on December 21, 2005.[6]

In the case against Saddam Hussein, the defendant made news by boycotting his own trial in the week before the court recessed.[7] It is unknown whether the boycott will continue when the court meets again this month.

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
The Extraordinary Chamber has not yet entered a phase of public legal activity.

The UN-Cambodia Agreement establishing the Extraordinary Chamber to adjudicate alleged international crimes committed during the period of Democratic Kampuchea entered into force this year on April 29.[8] This December, the UN Secretary-General conducted interviews for key court appointments.[9]



[1] For highlights of Ocampo’s address, see last Friday’s post here. Full text of the report to the UN is available here.
[2] Luis Moreno-Ocampo’s trial projection was made during this year’s 4th Assembly of States Parties in New York and reported in our post here. Other key events from the Assembly are discussed in posts from Nov. 28, Dec. 1, and Dec. 5.
[3] The Trial Chamber’s grant of additional time off and its denial of provisional release for Milosevic to seek medical treatment outside The Hague are discussed in our post here.
[4] Highlights from Del Ponte’s address, as well as some reaction to it, are discussed in our post here.
[5] Full text of Judge Møse’s speech is available here.
[6] For a discussion of events just prior to the election recess, see our post here.
[7] Saddam Hussein’s boycott discussed in our December 7 post here.
[8] G.A. Res. 57/228, U.N. GAOR, 57th Sess. U.N. Doc. A/Res/57/228 B (2003). Links to the full text of the Agreement in several languages is avaialable here.
[9] General information about organizational activities is available here.